infisical.com agentic web readiness
B Manifest validity: 75% (3/4 valid, 1 error, 7 warnings) · Surface score 39 (coverage 20 + breadth 9 + conformance 10). 5 standards observed across 2 of 9 steps; 4 manifests present (+ robots.txt, security.txt), 1 error, 7 warnings. Checked 2026-10-25 18:32:32 UTC. This grades the agent-facing files published at infisical.com, not the organisation's products.
Coverage by step
Manifests
| Manifest | Result | Findings |
|---|---|---|
Agentic Resource Discovery/.well-known/ard.json | errors |
View valid |
AI Catalog well-known file/.well-known/ai-catalog.json | absent HTTP 404 | |
MCP Server Cards (SEP-2127)/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json | valid |
|
Agent2Agent Protocol/.well-known/agent-card.json | absent HTTP 404 | |
llms.txt/llms.txt | valid | |
AGENTS.md/AGENTS.md | absent HTTP 404 | |
Agent Skills/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json | absent HTTP 404 | |
api-catalog: A Well-Known URI and Link Relation to Help Discovery of APIs/.well-known/api-catalog | valid | |
AI Crawler User-Agent Tokens in robots.txt/robots.txt | no AI tokens |
|
security.txt (RFC 9116)/.well-known/security.txt | valid | |
auth.md/auth.md | absent HTTP 404 | |
Open Knowledge Format/okf/index.md | absent HTTP 404 |
What an agent can call
- API description
https://infisical.com/openapi.json(application/vnd.oai.openapi+json;version=3.0) - API description
https://infisical.com/openapi.json(application/vnd.oai.openapi+json) - API description
https://infisical.com/docs/api-reference(text/html) - llms.txt: Infisical, 17 links, llms-full.txt present
- robots.txt AI policy: no AI crawler tokens named; unlisted crawlers allowed; Agentmap https://infisical.com/.well-known/ard.json
- ARD bridge (
/.well-known/ard.json): 3/19 valid, 0 legacy, 0 dead/broken
Standards observed
- llms.txt https://infisical.com/llms.txt
- Agentic Resource Discovery https://infisical.com/.well-known/ard.json
- api-catalog: A Well-Known URI and Link Relation to Help Discovery of APIs https://infisical.com/.well-known/api-catalog
- Markdown for Agents https://infisical.com/
- MCP Server Cards (SEP-2127)
Cheapest next steps
- AGENTS.md: instructions for coding agents working on or with the site
Generate starter
/AGENTS.mdfor infisical.com# Infisical for agents Infisical and what it offers to agents ## Read the data, not the HTML - Index: https://infisical.com/llms.txt - API description: https://infisical.com/openapi.json - Discovery catalog: https://infisical.com/.well-known/ard.json ## Calling - MCP server (Streamable HTTP): https://infisical.com/mcp - Rate limits and authentication: describe them here ## Conventions - How to cite or attribute content - What not to do (no scraping of /account/, no automated sign-ups, etc.) Contact: security@infisical.com
Agent pre-flight & practical readiness
Preferred mode: openapi (fallback llms_txt). Read the published API description and call those operations. Scraping HTML skips the interface the site already gave you.
Fetch: GET https://infisical.com/openapi.json GET the API description and call the documented operations.
Practical readability: exa_parsable yes, markdown negotiation yes, render markdown_native, HTML quality high, first content at byte 0, HTML-to-llms.txt token ratio 2.982×.
AI crawler posture: open_to_all · Assistant access: OpenAI allowed, Anthropic allowed, Google allowed, Perplexity allowed, Exa allowed.
Readiness subscores: reach 20/20, readability 30/30, capabilities 14/35, conformance 10/15, total 74/100, grade A.
How the grade is made
+10 per lifecycle step with a standard observed, counting manifests that validate or that the probe rule for the standard recognises (a valid MCP server card counts for MCP; max 90); +3 per observed standard beyond the first two (max 15); conformance +15 (+10 with one manifest) minus 5 per agent-facing manifest with errors, never below 0 (security.txt is reported, not scored). Lifecycle grade: A+ >= 60, A >= 45, B >= 30, C >= 20, D >= 10. Strict 100-point composite (subscores.total_100 / subscores.grade_100): reach_and_policy (20) + readability (30) + capabilities (35) + conformance (15), where A+ >= 80, A >= 65, B >= 45, C >= 28, D >= 15. Errors are specification violations; warnings are best-practice gaps. Only public paths are fetched, without credentials, so standards that need a login (skipped in the probe) are not counted either way. The same report is the validate_manifest tool on the MCP server.
JSON · Markdown · probe rules