developer.gemini.com agentic web readiness
B Manifest validity: 33% (1/3 valid, 10 errors, 7 warnings) · Surface score 41 (coverage 30 + breadth 6 + conformance 5). 4 standards observed across 3 of 9 steps; 3 manifests present (+ robots.txt), 10 errors, 7 warnings. Checked 2026-10-25 23:39:35 UTC. This grades the agent-facing files published at developer.gemini.com, not the organisation's products.
Coverage by step
Manifests
| Manifest | Result | Findings |
|---|---|---|
Agentic Resource Discovery/.well-known/ard.json | absent HTTP 404 | |
AI Catalog well-known file/.well-known/ai-catalog.json | absent HTTP 404 | |
MCP Server Cards (SEP-2127)/mcp/server-card | absent HTTP 404 | |
Agent2Agent Protocol/.well-known/agent-card.json | errors |
View valid |
llms.txt/llms.txt | valid | |
AGENTS.md/AGENTS.md | absent HTTP 404 | |
Agent Skills/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json | errors |
View valid |
api-catalog: A Well-Known URI and Link Relation to Help Discovery of APIs/.well-known/api-catalog | absent HTTP 404 | |
AI Crawler User-Agent Tokens in robots.txt/robots.txt | no AI tokens |
|
security.txt (RFC 9116)/.well-known/security.txt | absent HTTP 404 | |
auth.md/auth.md | absent HTTP 404 | |
Open Knowledge Format/okf/index.md | absent HTTP 404 |
What an agent can call
- A2A agent Gemini Developer Platform Agent at
https://developer.gemini.com/rest-api/rest-api, skills: Spot & Derivatives Trading, Market Data & Tickers, Fund & Account Management - llms.txt: Gemini Developer Platform API Documentation, 335 links, llms-full.txt present
- robots.txt AI policy: no AI crawler tokens named; unlisted crawlers allowed
Standards observed
- Agent2Agent Protocol https://developer.gemini.com/.well-known/agent-card.json
- llms.txt https://developer.gemini.com/llms.txt
- Agent Skills https://developer.gemini.com/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json
- Markdown for Agents https://developer.gemini.com/
Cheapest next steps
- Agentic Resource Discovery: a catalog at /.well-known/ard.json lets agents discover your APIs, MCP servers and data in one fetch
- AGENTS.md: instructions for coding agents working on or with the site
Generate starter
/AGENTS.mdfor developer.gemini.com# Developer for agents Developer and what it offers to agents ## Read the data, not the HTML - Index: https://developer.gemini.com/llms.txt - API description: https://developer.gemini.com/openapi.json - Discovery catalog: https://developer.gemini.com/.well-known/ard.json ## Calling - MCP server (Streamable HTTP): https://developer.gemini.com/mcp - Rate limits and authentication: describe them here ## Conventions - How to cite or attribute content - What not to do (no scraping of /account/, no automated sign-ups, etc.) Contact: security@developer.gemini.com
- api-catalog: A Well-Known URI and Link Relation to Help Discovery of APIs: an RFC 9727 linkset pointing at your OpenAPI description
Agent pre-flight & practical readiness
Preferred mode: a2a (fallback llms_txt). Send the task to the A2A agent endpoint named in the card. Use the card's skills instead of crawling pages.
Fetch: POST https://developer.gemini.com/rest-api/rest-api Send an A2A message to this agent endpoint. The card lists the skills.
Practical readability: exa_parsable yes, markdown negotiation yes, render markdown_native, HTML quality high, first content at byte 0.
AI crawler posture: open_to_all · Assistant access: OpenAI allowed, Anthropic allowed, Google allowed, Perplexity allowed, Exa allowed.
Readiness subscores: reach 20/20, readability 30/30, capabilities 12/35, conformance 5/15, total 67/100, grade A.
How the grade is made
+10 per lifecycle step with a standard observed, counting manifests that validate or that the probe rule for the standard recognises (a valid MCP server card counts for MCP; max 90); +3 per observed standard beyond the first two (max 15); conformance +15 (+10 with one manifest) minus 5 per agent-facing manifest with errors, never below 0 (security.txt is reported, not scored). Lifecycle grade: A+ >= 60, A >= 45, B >= 30, C >= 20, D >= 10. Strict 100-point composite (subscores.total_100 / subscores.grade_100): reach_and_policy (20) + readability (30) + capabilities (35) + conformance (15), where A+ >= 80, A >= 65, B >= 45, C >= 28, D >= 15. Errors are specification violations; warnings are best-practice gaps. Only public paths are fetched, without credentials, so standards that need a login (skipped in the probe) are not counted either way. The same report is the validate_manifest tool on the MCP server.
JSON · Markdown · probe rules