agenticweb.wiki

zuplo.com agentic web readiness

A+ Manifest validity: 86% (6/7 valid, 1 error, 5 warnings) · Surface score 65 (coverage 40 + breadth 15 + conformance 10). 12 standards observed across 4 of 9 steps; 7 manifests present, 1 error, 5 warnings. Checked 2026-10-25 19:17:36 UTC. This grades the agent-facing files published at zuplo.com, not the organisation's products.

Badge for a README: ![agentic web grade](https://agenticweb.wiki/badge/zuplo.com.svg) · JSON · Markdown · Re-check now

Coverage by step

01 DiscoverARD, RFC 972702 Identifynothing observed03 PermitContent Signals Policy, AI Crawler User-Agent Tokens in robots.txt, OAuth Protected Resource and Authorization Server Metadata (as used for agent authorization), ID-JAG, CIMD04 Readllms.txt, Markdown for Agents05 ActAgent Skills06 Coordinatenothing observed07 Paynothing observed08 Presentnothing observed

Manifests

ManifestResultFindings
Agentic Resource Discovery
/.well-known/ard.json		valid
  • no entry has representativeQueries; ARD registries use 2-5 example queries to index entries
AI Catalog well-known file
/.well-known/ai-catalog.json		absent HTTP 404
MCP Server Cards (SEP-2127)
/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json		valid
  • $schema is not https://static.modelcontextprotocol.io/schemas/v1/server-card.schema.json
  • remotes[0].supportedProtocolVersions missing; clients use it to pick a version before connecting
  • legacy /.well-known/mcp.json is still live and may shadow /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json in older scanners
Agent2Agent Protocol
/.well-known/agent-card.json		absent HTTP 404
llms.txt
/llms.txt		valid
AGENTS.md
/AGENTS.md		absent HTTP 404
Agent Skills
/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json		valid
api-catalog: A Well-Known URI and Link Relation to Help Discovery of APIs
/.well-known/api-catalog		valid
AI Crawler User-Agent Tokens in robots.txt
/robots.txt		valid
  • no Agentmap: line (optional convention pointing agents at /.well-known/ard.json)
security.txt (RFC 9116)
/.well-known/security.txt		absent HTTP 404
auth.md
/auth.md		errors
  • none of the auth.md mechanism names found (identity_assertion, service_auth, anonymous)
View valid /auth.md template for zuplo.com
# Authenticating to Zuplo as an agent

This file is the agent-auth skill for zuplo.com. It is linked from the authorization server's metadata (`agent_auth.skill`).

## Discovery
1. Call the API. A `401` carries `WWW-Authenticate: Bearer resource_metadata="https://zuplo.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource"`.
2. Read `/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource` (RFC 9728) for `resource` and `authorization_servers`.
3. Read the authorization server's `/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server` (RFC 8414); the `agent_auth` block lists the endpoints below.

## Methods we accept
- `identity_assertion`: you hold a session for a user and can mint an ID-JAG with `aud` = our `resource`. Preferred.
- `service_auth`: you only know the user's email. A claim ceremony (6-digit code) is required.
- `anonymous`: no user. Immediate limited scopes; the user can claim later.

## Register
POST `agent_auth.identity_endpoint` with `{"type": "<method>", ...}`; exchange the returned `identity_assertion` at the token endpoint for an access token.

## Scopes
- `api.read`: read
- `api.write`: write (claimed registrations only)

## Rules
- Show the user our name and the scopes before asserting their identity.
- Keep `claim_token` in memory only.
- Revocation events arrive as Security Event Tokens at your registered events endpoint.
Open Knowledge Format
/okf/index.md		absent HTTP 404

What an agent can call

Standards observed

Cheapest next steps

  1. AGENTS.md: instructions for coding agents working on or with the site
    Generate starter /AGENTS.md for zuplo.com
    # Zuplo for agents

Zuplo and what it offers to agents

## Read the data, not the HTML
- Index: https://zuplo.com/llms.txt
- API description: https://zuplo.com/openapi.json
- Discovery catalog: https://zuplo.com/.well-known/ard.json

## Calling
- MCP server (Streamable HTTP): https://zuplo.com/mcp
- Rate limits and authentication: describe them here

## Conventions
- How to cite or attribute content
- What not to do (no scraping of /account/, no automated sign-ups, etc.)

Contact: security@zuplo.com
  2. security.txt (RFC 9116): RFC 9116 contact and expiry, read by agents and people
    Generate starter /.well-known/security.txt for zuplo.com
    Contact: mailto:security@zuplo.com
Expires: 2027-09-20T19:17:36Z
Canonical: https://zuplo.com/.well-known/security.txt
Preferred-Languages: en
Policy: https://zuplo.com/security-policy

Agent pre-flight & practical readiness

Preferred mode: mcp (fallback openapi). Call the MCP endpoint at https://dev.zuplo.com/mcp/docs first. Do not scrape the HTML when a tool can answer.

Fetch: POST https://dev.zuplo.com/mcp/docs POST a JSON-RPC tools/list, or server/discover on the 2026-07-28 revision, before reading HTML.

Practical readability: exa_parsable yes, markdown negotiation yes, render markdown_native, HTML quality high, first content at byte 0, HTML-to-llms.txt token ratio 1.213×.

AI crawler posture: search_allowed_training_blocked · Assistant access: OpenAI allowed, Anthropic allowed, Google allowed, Perplexity allowed, Exa allowed.

Readiness subscores: reach 20/20, readability 30/30, capabilities 35/35, conformance 10/15, total 95/100, grade A+.

How the grade is made

+10 per lifecycle step with a standard observed, counting manifests that validate or that the probe rule for the standard recognises (a valid MCP server card counts for MCP; max 90); +3 per observed standard beyond the first two (max 15); conformance +15 (+10 with one manifest) minus 5 per agent-facing manifest with errors, never below 0 (security.txt is reported, not scored). Lifecycle grade: A+ >= 60, A >= 45, B >= 30, C >= 20, D >= 10. Strict 100-point composite (subscores.total_100 / subscores.grade_100): reach_and_policy (20) + readability (30) + capabilities (35) + conformance (15), where A+ >= 80, A >= 65, B >= 45, C >= 28, D >= 15. Errors are specification violations; warnings are best-practice gaps. Only public paths are fetched, without credentials, so standards that need a login (skipped in the probe) are not counted either way. The same report is the validate_manifest tool on the MCP server.

JSON · Markdown · probe rules