papermark.io agentic web readiness
A Manifest validity: 67% (2/3 valid, 3 errors, 8 warnings) · Surface score 46 (coverage 30 + breadth 6 + conformance 10). 4 standards observed across 3 of 9 steps; 3 manifests present, 3 errors, 8 warnings. Checked 2026-10-25 19:17:54 UTC. This grades the agent-facing files published at papermark.io, not the organisation's products.
Coverage by step
Manifests
| Manifest | Result | Findings |
|---|---|---|
Agentic Resource Discovery/.well-known/ard.json | absent HTTP 404 | |
AI Catalog well-known file/.well-known/ai-catalog.json | absent HTTP 404 | |
MCP Server Cards (SEP-2127)/.well-known/mcp.json | errors |
View valid |
Agent2Agent Protocol/.well-known/agent-card.json | absent HTTP 404 | |
llms.txt/llms.txt | valid |
|
AGENTS.md/AGENTS.md | redirected → www.papermark.com |
|
Agent Skills/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json | valid |
|
api-catalog: A Well-Known URI and Link Relation to Help Discovery of APIs/.well-known/api-catalog | absent HTTP 404 | |
AI Crawler User-Agent Tokens in robots.txt/robots.txt | redirected → www.papermark.com |
|
security.txt (RFC 9116)/.well-known/security.txt | absent HTTP 404 | |
auth.md/auth.md | redirected → www.papermark.com |
|
Open Knowledge Format/okf/index.md | redirected → www.papermark.com |
|
What an agent can call
- MCP endpoint
https://mcp.papermark.com/mcp(streamable-http), tools: datarooms, documents, folders, links, views, visitors — from/.well-known/mcp.json - llms.txt: Papermark - secure open-source virtual data room and document sharing, 60 links, llms-full.txt present
Standards observed
- llms.txt https://papermark.io/llms.txt
- Agent Skills https://papermark.io/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json
- MCP Server Cards (SEP-2127)
- Model Context Protocol
Cheapest next steps
- AI Crawler User-Agent Tokens in robots.txt: state what AI crawlers may do in robots.txt you already serve
Generate starter
/robots.txtfor papermark.io# search and answer-engine crawlers User-agent: Googlebot User-agent: bingbot User-agent: OAI-SearchBot User-agent: Claude-SearchBot User-agent: PerplexityBot User-agent: ExaSearchBot User-agent: TavilyBot Allow: / # model-training crawlers: choose Allow or Disallow and keep it explicit User-agent: GPTBot User-agent: ClaudeBot User-agent: Google-Extended User-agent: Applebot-Extended User-agent: CCBot User-agent: meta-externalagent User-agent: Bytespider Disallow: / # user-triggered fetchers (a person asked for this page) User-agent: ChatGPT-User User-agent: Claude-User User-agent: Perplexity-User Allow: / # default fallback for unlisted crawlers (RFC 9309 §2.2.1: specific groups above take precedence over *) User-agent: * Allow: / Disallow: /account/ Content-Signal: ai-train=no, search=yes, ai-input=yes Sitemap: https://papermark.io/sitemap.xml Agentmap: https://papermark.io/.well-known/ard.json
- Agentic Resource Discovery: a catalog at /.well-known/ard.json lets agents discover your APIs, MCP servers and data in one fetch
- AGENTS.md: instructions for coding agents working on or with the site
Generate starter
/AGENTS.mdfor papermark.io# Papermark for agents Papermark and what it offers to agents ## Read the data, not the HTML - Index: https://papermark.io/llms.txt - API description: https://papermark.io/openapi.json - Discovery catalog: https://papermark.io/.well-known/ard.json ## Calling - MCP server (Streamable HTTP): https://papermark.io/mcp - Rate limits and authentication: describe them here ## Conventions - How to cite or attribute content - What not to do (no scraping of /account/, no automated sign-ups, etc.) Contact: security@papermark.io
Agent pre-flight & practical readiness
Preferred mode: mcp (fallback agent_skills). Call the MCP endpoint at https://mcp.papermark.com/mcp first. Do not scrape the HTML when a tool can answer.
Fetch: POST https://mcp.papermark.com/mcp POST a JSON-RPC tools/list, or server/discover on the 2026-07-28 revision, before reading HTML.
Practical readability: exa_parsable yes, markdown negotiation no, render none, HTML quality none.
AI crawler posture: unspecified · Assistant access: OpenAI unspecified, Anthropic unspecified, Google unspecified, Perplexity unspecified, Exa unspecified.
Readiness subscores: reach 0/20, readability 10/30, capabilities 21/35, conformance 10/15, total 41/100, grade C.
How the grade is made
+10 per lifecycle step with a standard observed, counting manifests that validate or that the probe rule for the standard recognises (a valid MCP server card counts for MCP; max 90); +3 per observed standard beyond the first two (max 15); conformance +15 (+10 with one manifest) minus 5 per agent-facing manifest with errors, never below 0 (security.txt is reported, not scored). Lifecycle grade: A+ >= 60, A >= 45, B >= 30, C >= 20, D >= 10. Strict 100-point composite (subscores.total_100 / subscores.grade_100): reach_and_policy (20) + readability (30) + capabilities (35) + conformance (15), where A+ >= 80, A >= 65, B >= 45, C >= 28, D >= 15. Errors are specification violations; warnings are best-practice gaps. Only public paths are fetched, without credentials, so standards that need a login (skipped in the probe) are not counted either way. The same report is the validate_manifest tool on the MCP server.
JSON · Markdown · probe rules