agenticweb.wiki

graphlit.com agentic web readiness

A Manifest validity: 100% (1/1 valid, 0 errors, 4 warnings) · Surface score 46 (coverage 30 + breadth 6 + conformance 10). 4 standards observed across 3 of 9 steps; 1 manifest present (+ robots.txt), 0 errors, 4 warnings. Checked 2026-10-25 19:16:59 UTC. This grades the agent-facing files published at graphlit.com, not the organisation's products.

Badge for a README: ![agentic web grade](https://agenticweb.wiki/badge/graphlit.com.svg) · JSON · Markdown · Re-check now

Coverage by step

01 Discovernothing observed02 Identifynothing observed03 PermitOAuth Protected Resource and Authorization Server Metadata (as used for agent authorization), CIMD04 Readllms.txt05 Act06 Coordinatenothing observed07 Paynothing observed08 Presentnothing observed

Manifests

ManifestResultFindings
Agentic Resource Discovery
/.well-known/ard.json
absent HTTP 404
AI Catalog well-known file
/.well-known/ai-catalog.json
absent HTTP 404
MCP Server Cards (SEP-2127)
/mcp/server-card
absent
  • not fetched: disallowed_by_robots_txt
Agent2Agent Protocol
/.well-known/agent-card.json
absent HTTP 404
llms.txt
/llms.txt
valid
  • no blockquote summary under the title
AGENTS.md
/AGENTS.md
redirected → graphlit.dev
  • not fetched: redirect off-host to graphlit.dev
Agent Skills
/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json
absent HTTP 404
api-catalog: A Well-Known URI and Link Relation to Help Discovery of APIs
/.well-known/api-catalog
absent HTTP 404
AI Crawler User-Agent Tokens in robots.txt
/robots.txt
no AI tokens
  • no AI crawler token named (GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, ...); the policy for them is whatever User-agent: * says (partial)
  • no Agentmap: line (optional convention pointing agents at /.well-known/ard.json)
  • no Content-Signal: line (optional; states ai-train / search / ai-input preferences)
security.txt (RFC 9116)
/.well-known/security.txt
absent HTTP 404
auth.md
/auth.md
redirected → graphlit.dev
  • not fetched: redirect off-host to graphlit.dev
Open Knowledge Format
/okf/index.md
absent HTTP 404

What an agent can call

Standards observed

Cheapest next steps

  1. Agentic Resource Discovery: a catalog at /.well-known/ard.json lets agents discover your APIs, MCP servers and data in one fetch (emerging spec — publish only if you run the underlying endpoints; generate via MCP template({"id": "ard", "domain": "graphlit.com"}))
  2. AGENTS.md: instructions for coding agents working on or with the site
    Generate starter /AGENTS.md for graphlit.com
    # Graphlit for agents
    
    Graphlit and what it offers to agents
    
    ## Read the data, not the HTML
    - Index: https://graphlit.com/llms.txt
    - API description: https://graphlit.com/openapi.json
    - Discovery catalog: https://graphlit.com/.well-known/ard.json
    
    ## Calling
    - MCP server (Streamable HTTP): https://graphlit.com/mcp
    - Rate limits and authentication: describe them here
    
    ## Conventions
    - How to cite or attribute content
    - What not to do (no scraping of /account/, no automated sign-ups, etc.)
    
    Contact: security@graphlit.com
    
  3. api-catalog: A Well-Known URI and Link Relation to Help Discovery of APIs: an RFC 9727 linkset pointing at your OpenAPI description (conditional spec — publish only if you run the underlying endpoints; generate via MCP template({"id": "api-catalog-rfc9727", "domain": "graphlit.com"}))

Agent pre-flight & practical readiness

Preferred mode: mcp (fallback llms_txt). Call the MCP endpoint at https://graphlit.com/mcp first. Do not scrape the HTML when a tool can answer.

Fetch: POST https://graphlit.com/mcp POST a JSON-RPC tools/list, or server/discover on the 2026-07-28 revision, before reading HTML.

Practical readability: exa_parsable yes, markdown negotiation no, render csr_hydration_trapped, HTML quality js_shell, HTML-to-llms.txt token ratio 4.275×.

AI crawler posture: open_to_all · Assistant access: OpenAI allowed, Anthropic allowed, Google allowed, Perplexity allowed, Exa allowed.

Readiness subscores: reach 20/20, readability 10/30, capabilities 18/35, conformance 10/15, total 58/100, grade B.

How the grade is made

+10 per lifecycle step with a standard observed, counting manifests that validate or that the probe rule for the standard recognises (a valid MCP server card counts for MCP; max 90); +3 per observed standard beyond the first two (max 15); conformance +15 (+10 with one manifest) minus 5 per agent-facing manifest with errors, never below 0 (security.txt is reported, not scored). Lifecycle grade: A+ >= 60, A >= 45, B >= 30, C >= 20, D >= 10. Strict 100-point composite (subscores.total_100 / subscores.grade_100): reach_and_policy (20) + readability (30) + capabilities (35) + conformance (15), where A+ >= 80, A >= 65, B >= 45, C >= 28, D >= 15. Errors are specification violations; warnings are best-practice gaps. Only public paths are fetched, without credentials, so standards that need a login (skipped in the probe) are not counted either way. The same report is the validate_manifest tool on the MCP server.

JSON · Markdown · probe rules