agenticweb.wiki

cafe24.com agentic web readiness

B Manifest validity: 100% (1/1 valid, 0 errors, 1 warning) · Surface score 30 (coverage 20 + breadth 0 + conformance 10). 2 standards observed across 2 of 9 steps; 1 manifest present, 0 errors, 1 warning. Checked 2026-10-23 13:27:54 UTC via www.cafe24.com. This grades the agent-facing files published at cafe24.com, not the organisation's products.

Badge for a README: ![agentic web grade](https://agenticweb.wiki/badge/cafe24.com.svg) · JSON · Markdown · Re-check now

Coverage by step

01 Discovernothing observed02 Identifynothing observed03 PermitOAuth Protected Resource and Authorization Server Metadata (as used for agent authorization)04 Readllms.txt05 Actnothing observed06 Coordinatenothing observed07 Paynothing observed08 Presentnothing observed

Manifests

ManifestResultFindings
Agentic Resource Discovery
/.well-known/ard.json
absent HTTP 404
AI Catalog well-known file
/.well-known/ai-catalog.json
absent HTTP 404
MCP Server Cards (SEP-2127)
/mcp/server-card
absent HTTP 404
Agent2Agent Protocol
/.well-known/agent-card.json
absent HTTP 404
llms.txt
/llms.txt
valid
AGENTS.md
/AGENTS.md
absent HTTP 404
Agent Skills
/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json
absent HTTP 404
api-catalog: A Well-Known URI and Link Relation to Help Discovery of APIs
/.well-known/api-catalog
absent HTTP 404
AI Crawler User-Agent Tokens in robots.txt
/robots.txt
soft-404 HTML
  • answered with an HTML page (catch-all or soft 404), counted as absent
security.txt (RFC 9116)
/.well-known/security.txt
absent HTTP 404
auth.md
/auth.md
absent HTTP 404
Open Knowledge Format
/okf/index.md
absent HTTP 404

What an agent can call

Standards observed

Cheapest next steps

  1. AI Crawler User-Agent Tokens in robots.txt: state what AI crawlers may do in robots.txt you already serve
  2. Agentic Resource Discovery: a catalog at /.well-known/ard.json lets agents discover your APIs, MCP servers and data in one fetch
  3. AGENTS.md: instructions for coding agents working on or with the site

Agent pre-flight & practical readiness

Preferred mode: llms_txt. GET /llms.txt and follow the links it names. That index is the page list an agent should read.

Fetch: GET https://cafe24.com/llms.txt GET /llms.txt and follow its links.

Practical readability: exa_parsable yes, markdown negotiation no, render ssr_rich, HTML quality high, first content at byte 56392, JSON-LD Organization.

AI crawler posture: unspecified · Assistant access: OpenAI unspecified, Anthropic unspecified, Google unspecified, Perplexity unspecified, Exa unspecified.

Readiness subscores: reach 0/20, readability 22/30, capabilities 6/35, conformance 10/15, total 38/100, grade C.

How the grade is made

+10 per lifecycle step with a standard observed, counting manifests that validate or that the probe rule for the standard recognises (a valid MCP server card counts for MCP; max 90); +3 per observed standard beyond the first two (max 15); conformance +15 (+10 with one manifest) minus 5 per agent-facing manifest with errors, never below 0 (security.txt is reported, not scored). Lifecycle grade: A+ >= 60, A >= 45, B >= 30, C >= 20, D >= 10. Strict 100-point composite (subscores.total_100 / subscores.grade_100): reach_and_policy (20) + readability (30) + capabilities (35) + conformance (15), where A+ >= 80, A >= 65, B >= 45, C >= 28, D >= 15. Errors are specification violations; warnings are best-practice gaps. Only public paths are fetched, without credentials, so standards that need a login (skipped in the probe) are not counted either way. The same report is the validate_manifest tool on the MCP server.

JSON · Markdown · probe rules